Home      Contact      Index      FAQ's      Leave      Case Law      Purchase
Cannot take retaliatory action against employees for claiming their employment rights

A South Auckland bus company has found itself in hot water with the Employment Court after it dismissed three employees for failing to report for work. The employees were absent because they were prosecuting a claim against the Company in the Employment Tribunal for unpaid holiday pay and other employment entitlements.

V & W Wanoa Coachlines operated a school bus and charter service in South Auckland. It employed Orman Thomas, Haarni Kingi and Laurie Page as part-time bus drivers.

Last year, the three drivers became concerned about their rates of pay and other employment entitlements, including the non-payment of holiday pay. They sought assistance from the National Distribution Union, and eventually filed arrears of wages claims with the Employment Tribunal. The case was set down for a two-day adjudication hearing.

To prove their claims, the drivers had to go to the Employment Tribunal and give evidence. They therefore informed the Company that they would not be coming to work while the hearing was on. The Company responded by advising them that they might not have any jobs to come back to and others might be made casual, on-call contractors if they persisted with their claim. The drivers were undeterred and went to the Tribunal hearing to give evidence.

Almost immediately after the Tribunal hearing and while the Tribunal adjudicator was considering his decision, the Company put into effect what it said it would do. It told the drivers that they were no longer employees but were rather casual, on-call contractors and it would be in touch with them when their services were needed. The drivers were not called on to work again.

The drivers brought personal grievance proceedings against the Company for unjustified dismissal. They also applied to the Employment Court for an interim injunction reinstating them to their former positions until their personal grievances had been heard and determined.

The Employment Court granted the interim injunction and ordered that they be immediately reinstated to their jobs as permanent part-time drivers. Judge Graeme Colgan pointed out that not only did the drivers have an arguable claim for unjustified dismissal, but they also appeared to have been discriminated against in their employment.

Both the Employment Contracts Act and the new Employment Relations Act prohibit employers from taking adverse retaliatory action against employees for claiming their contractual or statutory employment rights. Such retaliatory action constitutes discrimination and can found a personal grievance claim.


More on Termination & Dismissal
  An employer's rights: Surfing all the day   Driver lost license
  Dealing with absent employees   Importance of procedural fairness
  Must consult in redundancy dismissals   Dismissal must be procedurally fair
  Misconduct discovered after dismissal   Another procedural fairness example
  Dismissed for benefit fraud   Terminated before started
  The danger of secret witnesses   Expired employment contract
  Cannot intimidate employer   Cannot rely on police enquiry
  Reasonable notice of redundancy   Contractural obligation must be met
  Reinstatement and workplace democracy   Employment and criminal investigation
  Attack not always good defence   Dismissal of persons in authority
  Employee responds by going on offensive   Legality of secret video surveillance
  ERA classifies contractor as employee   Redundancy law unchanged by ERA
  Loss of use of company car   Significant difference
  Resolution of criminal charges   Redundancy and changed hours
  Discrimination for being non Asian   Cannot take retaliatory action
  Failing to meet sales targets   Misconduct outside of work
  Abuse of Internet & Email   Suicide and communication
  Redundancy definition   Unjustified dismissal for pornography
  Abandonment of employment  
  Alphabetical Index   Case Law Back to top
This article originally written by Alan Cressey the copyright of which is owned by The Evening Post
Copyright © 1985 - 2010 Ace Payroll
Feedback? E-Mail Us!
Call Toll Free
0800 223 729
Updated: 31st March 2010
Published: 5th March 2001
Back to top