Home      Contact      Index      FAQ's      Leave      Case Law      Purchase
Redundancy law unchanged by Employment Relations Act

In a case brought by Michael Baguley against his former employer, Coutts Cars Ltd, the Employment Court is today considering whether the new Employment Relations Act introduces changes to redundancy law.

Coutts Cars employed four car groomers, including Mr Baguley. The company decided that it could save costs by making two groomers redundant, and contracting out some grooming work to an outside firm.

To decide who should be made redundant, it completed an assessment form in respect of each groomer and assessed them on quality and quantity of work, job knowledge, initiative, communication, adaptability and co-operation, attendance and qualifications. As a result of the assessment process, Mr Baguley and another worker were identified as being the two employees to be made redundant. Neither Mr Baguley nor the other employee had any input into the assessment.

After the assessment was completed, the Company met with Mr Baguley and informed him that the number of groomers had to be reduced by two, and that a selection process had been used to determine which two were to stay. Mr Baguley asked to be told of the selection criteria used, but the Company refused his request. After further discussions, Mr Baguley was made redundant.

Mr Baguley claimed unjustified dismissal and filed his claim with the new Employment Relations Authority. The Authority held an investigative meeting and issued a decision rejecting his claim.

Mr Baguley argued before the Authority that the new Employment Relations Act, and in particular the requirement that parties must act in good faith towards one another, meant that he was entitled to be told of the selection criteria used and have input into it. Because he was not given this opportunity, his dismissal was unjustified.

The Authority rejected this claim and held that the new Act made no changes to redundancy law. The Authority pointed out that the requirements of good faith in a redundancy situation existed before the new Act was passed, and that previous case law was therefore still valid because it had been developed with good faith principles in mind.

Mr Baguley appealed to the Employment Court. As the case raised important questions of law under the new Act, Chief Judge Goddard decided to convene a full Court of three judges, instead of the usual one, to hear the case. The Employment Court's decision is still pending.


More on Termination & Dismissal
  An employer's rights: Surfing all the day   Driver lost license
  Dealing with absent employees   Importance of procedural fairness
  Must consult in redundancy dismissals   Dismissal must be procedurally fair
  Misconduct discovered after dismissal   Another procedural fairness example
  Dismissed for benefit fraud   Terminated before started
  The danger of secret witnesses   Expired employment contract
  Cannot intimidate employer   Cannot rely on police enquiry
  Reasonable notice of redundancy   Contractural obligation must be met
  Reinstatement and workplace democracy   Employment and criminal investigation
  Attack not always good defence   Dismissal of persons in authority
  Employee responds by going on offensive   Legality of secret video surveillance
  ERA classifies contractor as employee   Redundancy law unchanged by ERA
  Loss of use of company car   Significant difference
  Resolution of criminal charges   Redundancy and changed hours
  Discrimination for being non Asian   Cannot take retaliatory action
  Failing to meet sales targets   Misconduct outside of work
  Abuse of Internet & Email   Suicide and communication
  Redundancy definition   Unjustified dismissal for pornography
  Abandonment of employment  
  Alphabetical Index   Case Law Back to top
This article originally written by Alan Cressey the copyright of which is owned by The Evening Post
Copyright © 1985 - 2010 Ace Payroll
Feedback? E-Mail Us!
Call Toll Free
0800 223 729
Updated: 31st March 2010
Published: 19th December 2000
Back to top